Sivakasi
and its surrounding villages in southern Tamil Nadu are the most
cracker-accident prone places in the country. The tragic death of nearly 38
workers and onlookers at a fireworks unit in Mudalipatti village is one of the
so many fire accidents the district has facing so far in the last few years.
The main reason for this havoc is the reason that it has not been deployed with
proper enforcement of rules. There haven't been many situations where the
police forces feebly fought the public - the 'on-lookers' - who overstepped the
fence put rounding the explosion site and such was the terribleness of the
incident that the on-lookers were the huge causalities for their attempt in
rescuing their fellow people. According to the sources in and around the
accident place, it is said that the Petroleum and Explosives Safety
Organization, mandated with responsibilities under the Explosives Act and the
Petroleum Act, is reported to have suspended the license of the unit just a day
before the accident. Thus, it is obvious that the concerned authority has not
taken serious inspections in the unit and issue intense warnings if anything in
the unit is out of order or seems like violating the rules. The national
Factories Act, 1948, and the Tamil Nadu Fire Service Act, 1985, empower safety
inspectors and fire service officers to order the factory owners to stick to
the rules or stop the operations that particular industry is doing. There is no
doubt that this particular accident is all about the non-compliance of the
small-scale industries with safety norms and hence witnessing a tragedy that is
a telling statement on the failure of enforcement authorities in supervising
these hazardous units at the peak of their activity in the weeks leading to
Diwali. The supervising organizations include PESO also which is one of the
most influential bodies in view of checking such risks and safety measures
concerned. Most of those killed in the accident were onlookers who rushed to
the site on hearing the first explosion and in the intention of saving their
people. But unfortunately, the first explosion was followed by another one
which was more severe than its predecessor which caused the maximum number of
deaths. This makes the thing of brutality very clear that the calculation of
huge risks involved in these units have not been carefully analyzed and the
severity of such accidents were not clearly explained to the workers and the
people living around the place. With all these information put into the view,
this particular accident can be well termed as an 'incident'. Other than some
weak attempts to push people back, the police appear to have done little to
warn the crowd that had gathered of the impending danger. The sense of tragedy
is the greater because not only were the explosions preventable, but the deaths
in the explosions too could have been avoided with some foresight and greater
effort, had the local authorities developed protocols for dealing with
hazardous fires in a high-risk area like Sivakasi. Finally, only tough
enforcement of production and storage rules is the only way to minimize and
eliminate risk in the firecracker industry. Wishing that this Diwali will not
bear the stamp of so many deaths at the back of its cracker covers. Strict
enforcement of rules over the small scale industries alone will help the people
involved. The rolling stone could never be stopped. Let us make its road flat!
A phenomenal and everlasting legacy begins with the very first thought! An idea is even costlier than the end product itself.. I believe that I should be the change to the ever-expecting society which has brought me up!
Showing posts with label regulations. Show all posts
Showing posts with label regulations. Show all posts
Friday, 14 September 2012
Thursday, 6 September 2012
THE OTHER FACE OF MEDIA
Where we are heading to? Indian
media over the last few years have grown a tendency of 'cooking the news'. The
growing number of news channels have flooded the country with highlighted news
and over-analyzed anticipations. In case of the 26/11 Mumbai attacks, the
private news channels have made the issue a bit too much to say the least. The
coverage of those attacks has thus far been termed as 'the ultimate low in the
history of Indian news channels'. There could be no other disgrace which hurtled
the people more than this news coverage of 26/11 attacks. In the view that the
Pakistani masterminds regulated the activities from being at their camps with
the help of the terrorists here by is due to the live coverage of the hostage issue.
This is literally called as the 'walking on a knife'. The court should curtail
the TV channels for risking the right to life of others while taking care of
allowing them the right to free expression. Private TV channels should
themselves know what is right and what is wrong, thereby establishing a rule
book for regulating news coverage on their own. After the introduction of
self-regulation into the rules of TV channels, the other national events were
covered with legitimately with heart and mind. The liability of information
suggested so far in TV coverage has been too much for an ordinary person to
digest. In fact, regarding the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks, the news coverage
acted as a medium of communication between the terrorists and their handlers
who were the masterminds and had their base at their own place back in
Pakistan. No matter how farfetched this trajectory of the news projection, the
TV channels have certainly violated the basic rules enrolled on them. The
Supreme Court hangs on the balance between providing justice to the seekers of
'Right to live' who have been hurtled by the TV Channels indirectly and
allowing the media their own, 'Right to free expression'! But the fact is that
the basic right to free expression is for the people and in the scenario where
even they are violated by this right, the basics have to be redefined. The
question of redefinition is 'is government there for the people or for the
rules?’ If this question is answered by changing the most basic amenities to
live better, there is no doubt why there could be two swords in a single stand.
After the Supreme Court's order of 'self-regulation' over the private news
channels was implemented, the news coverage of similar subsequent events after
26/11 attacks was well established with an open-heart and mind. The going is
better only in the sense there is nothing tougher on the way. Stern tests await
the media and their efficiency for bringing out better scrutinizing of news
will be looked upon seriously. If the going gets tough, the tough gets going.
There is peace and war in everything around us. Wish the media takes the peace
out of the wars and give us better life!!
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)